free hit counter
Case against man who texted photo of his tattooed genitals dismissed - Redneck Clubhouse - Of, By and For Rednecks!

Law and Justice System Legal issues

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old March 2nd, 2014, 10:13 PM
Newsboi's Avatar
Newsboi Newsboi is offline
USMBs News Hound
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 575
Likes Given: 0
Liked 3 in 3 Posts
Newsboi is on a distinguished roadNewsboi is on a distinguished road
Default Case against man who texted photo of his tattooed genitals dismissed

By David Beasley

ATLANTA Mon Feb 24, 2014 3:02pm EST

<span id="articleText"><span id="midArticle_start"/> ATLANTA (Reuters) - A man accused of texting an unsolicited picture of his tattooed genitals to a married mother of young children did not commit a crime under a Georgia state nudity law, the state's Supreme Court ruled on Monday.

<span id="midArticle_1"/> Charles Lee Warren faced up to three years in prison after being indicted under a 1970 Georgia law that makes it illegal to send unsolicited nude photographs by mail without a proper warning on the outside of the envelope.

<span id="midArticle_2"/> Prosecutors said he texted the picture of his tattooed penis in October 2012 to a woman who then complained to police. According to prosecutors, Warren's genitals were tattooed with the phrase, "STRONG E nuf 4 A MAN BUT Made 4 A WOMAN."

<span id="midArticle_3"/> The Georgia Supreme Court said the state law did not cover photos sent electronically through a cell phone text message, and justices dismissed the criminal charge in a unanimous decision.

<span id="midArticle_4"/> Legislation proposed last year to amend the law to include pictures transmitted electronically did not pass, according to Georgia General Assembly records.

<span id="midArticle_5"/> The state has no other law governing these types of cases, said Lauren Kane, spokeswoman for Georgia Attorney General Sam Olens.

<span id="midArticle_6"/> "We respectfully accept the decision of the Georgia Supreme Court," Cherokee County District Attorney Shannon Wallace, whose office prosecuted the texting case, said in a statement.

<span id="midArticle_7"/> The defendant's attorney, Donald Roch, also challenged the law on the ground that it violated his client's First Amendment guarantee of free speech, but the court did not address that constitutional issue.

<span id="midArticle_8"/> "Obviously, we're pleased with the ruling," Roch said.

<span id="midArticle_9"/> (Editing by Colleen Jenkins and Sophie Hares)

<span id="midArticle_10"/>
  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Print
  • Reprints

All the news that is news!


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content copyright ©2000 - 2019 all rights reserved